Scenario Overview - Member Quota Request and Allocation
This scenario helps provider administrators request, adjust, and limit quota according to member needs while reconciling member, project, and key constraints.
Applicable Roles
- Provider administrators, Model Providers, and end users who request quota
Scenario Goals
- Give each request an amount, reason, and unique pending record.
- Adjust the correct member in the correct direction with a recorded reason.
- Keep member limits, model allowlists, project budgets, and key limits consistent.
- Verify changes in member details and through an actual controlled call.
Scenario Flow
Main path: Locate member -> Submit quota request -> Track status -> Adjust member quota -> Set limits -> Validate calls
| Stage | Key Result |
|---|---|
| 1. Establish the baseline | Current authorization, usage, balance, and model scope are known |
| 2. Request quota | Amount, reason, and approval state are traceable |
| 3. Allocate and limit | Member quota and reset policy match project and key boundaries |
| 4. Validate | Member details and controlled calls show the expected result |
Before You Start
- Identify the target member, additional quota, and business reason.
- Confirm that no duplicate request is pending.
- Define the reset cycle, limit-reached policy, and model scope before setting limits.
Recommended Reading Order
- Review the member's quota and existing usage.
- Submit and track the quota request.
- Adjust member quota and limits after approval.
- Validate with the member account or key.
Document Index
| Document | Description |
|---|---|
| Member Quota Request and Allocation Workflow | Steps from request through adjustment, limits, and call validation |
Completion Checklist
Purpose: These are the scenario exit criteria. Use them to confirm that the approved quota reached the intended member and remains consistent with project and key limits.
| Check | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|
| 1 | Request member, quota amount, and business reason are correct. |
| 2 | Request status, approval result, and adjustment record are traceable. |
| 3 | Member quota, model scope, project budget, and key limit are consistent. |
| 4 | Remaining quota and actual call behavior match expectations after adjustment. |