Skip to content

Scenario Overview - Member Quota Request and Allocation ​

This scenario helps provider administrators request, adjust, and limit quota according to member needs while reconciling member, project, and key constraints.

Applicable Roles ​

  • Provider administrators, Model Providers, and end users who request quota

Scenario Goals ​

  • Give each request an amount, reason, and unique pending record.
  • Adjust the correct member in the correct direction with a recorded reason.
  • Keep member limits, model allowlists, project budgets, and key limits consistent.
  • Verify changes in member details and through an actual controlled call.

Scenario Flow ​

Main path: Locate member -> Submit quota request -> Track status -> Adjust member quota -> Set limits -> Validate calls

StageKey Result
1. Establish the baselineCurrent authorization, usage, balance, and model scope are known
2. Request quotaAmount, reason, and approval state are traceable
3. Allocate and limitMember quota and reset policy match project and key boundaries
4. ValidateMember details and controlled calls show the expected result

Before You Start ​

  • Identify the target member, additional quota, and business reason.
  • Confirm that no duplicate request is pending.
  • Define the reset cycle, limit-reached policy, and model scope before setting limits.
  1. Review the member's quota and existing usage.
  2. Submit and track the quota request.
  3. Adjust member quota and limits after approval.
  4. Validate with the member account or key.

Document Index ​

DocumentDescription
Member Quota Request and Allocation WorkflowSteps from request through adjustment, limits, and call validation

Completion Checklist ​

Purpose: These are the scenario exit criteria. Use them to confirm that the approved quota reached the intended member and remains consistent with project and key limits.

CheckPass Criteria
1Request member, quota amount, and business reason are correct.
2Request status, approval result, and adjustment record are traceable.
3Member quota, model scope, project budget, and key limit are consistent.
4Remaining quota and actual call behavior match expectations after adjustment.